RE: [SE] Software Engineering Task Force Telecon 18-01-05 Summary

Hi Mike,
your suggested contents are in line with one of the
comments I made earlier (pasted below from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jan/0046.html).
IMHO this is pretty important so we should clarify it.

Best,
  Daniel

> I was left a bit confused. What's unclear IMO is if
> 
> a) we want to use Semantic Web technologies in SE
>     example: using OWL for reasoning and querying with software
>     components in an Application Server to improve component-based
>     SE (like done in [4]) -> the Semantic Web itself is of no interest here
> 
> or
> 
> b) we want to use/incorporate the Semantic Web in SE
>     example: like you describe it in the text below, we could use the
>     Web for runtime component sharing, not to mention the exciting
>     possibilities of Semantic Web Services -> the Semantic Web with
>     its annotated resources is of interest here
> 
> Apart from the fact that one can do both at a time, I think the
> points should be presented separately. The distinction is also unclear
> in the text below what gave me a hard time following it.