W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > January 2005

Re: OMG Ontology Metamodel Definition Review

From: Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:06:22 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, ewallace <ewallace@cme.nist>
Message-ID: <OF07D9A740.C0736F26-ON80256F95.005F2F93-85256F95.00624F6E@uk.ibm.com>





Jeremy,

Firstly, you are correct to state that this is not a corporate issue.
Thanks.

Secondly I look forward to hearing your point of view - should be
interesting and useful as always. If its of any benefit, please feel free
to ring me to discuss.

Kind Regards

Phil Tetlow
Senior Consultant
IBM Business Consulting Services
Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328


                                                                           
             Jeremy Carroll                                                
             <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.                                             
             com>                                                       To 
                                       Phil Tetlow/UK/IBM@IBMGB            
             26/01/2005 12:00                                           cc 
                                       Christopher Welty                   
                                       <welty@us.ibm.com>,                 
                                       public-swbp-wg@w3.org,              
                                       ewallace@cme.nist.gov, Grady Booch  
                                       <gbooch@us.ibm.com>, Bob            
                                       Lojek/UK/IBM@IBMGB                  
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: OMG Ontology Metamodel          
                                       Definition Review                   
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Thanks, that's helpful ... at a personal level I would be uncomfortable
with the previously highlighted paragraph being forwarded as part of a
WG review; I'm trying to sound out some of my colleagues who are more
knowledgeable on UML than me, but it feels like I can leave it at the
level of Jeremy disagrees with Phil rather than escalate to HP disagrees
with IBM!

(I guess I should try and articulate why I disagree with you ..
hopefully before the telecon tomorrow)

I suspect some of my comments lean in the other direction, I'll try and
highlight those ones when I write them up tomorrow.

Jeremy


Phil Tetlow wrote:
>
>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> Certainly. My recollection of the last telecon was that Guus asked for a
> personal review of the ODM document and, as such, I tried hard to phrase
my
> mail from a first person perspective. The text below, as you quite
> correctly identified, is, hence, solely a collection of personal thoughts
> and in no way represents IBM's corporate opinion. If a corporate opinion
is
> required then this will take significantly more time and effort.
> Nevertheless I did pass my review by Bob Lojek for comment before I
> submitted to the public mailing list . As such I have also copied him on
> this mail as well.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Phil Tetlow
> Senior Consultant
> IBM Business Consulting Services
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 18:02:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:41 UTC