- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:48:51 -0500
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
At 06:13 PM 2/8/2005 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >I propose to move the SKOS Core Guide [1] to first working draft status. ... >[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/guide/ I omitted the second point I had intended to make. It is important that the Working Group state -- in the Status of this Document section -- what it intends to be the end result of this Working Draft. For example, the OEP Working Drafts say "This document is intended to be a part of a future W3C Working Group Note that will provide an introduction and overview of all ontology design patterns..." The key words there are "future W3C Working Group Note". No one remembered to raise this question at the last WG telecon, and as the Task Force did not specifically suggest that it wants SKOS to be considered for proposal as a W3C Recommendation, I am guessing that most folk assumed that the SKOS documents were also headed to become WG Notes. Please add another sentence to the second paragraph of the Status section indicating (for example) that this document is intended to be part of a set of W3C Working Group Notes describing a simple vocabulary for expressing controlled vocabularies.
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 20:49:47 UTC