Re: invited experts [was: Re: meeting record: 2005-04-07 SWBPD telecon] from ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 2005-04-08 (public-swbp-wg@w3.org from April 2005)

From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: pan@cs.man.ac.uk, swick@w3.org
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Message-Id: <200504082050.QAA29951@clue.mel.nist.gov>

>>   ... main point is that the critical expertise is not present in the WG
>>   and justification for why the recommended person works for an
>>   organization that is not a W3C Member
>
This probably would be better worded: "...and justification for why the 
organization for which the recommended person works is not a W3C member."

Chris recommended two academics to fill this role.  We need to verify
that neither of their universities are members.  I am not sure what to
do beyond that.?

-Evan

Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 20:50:15 UTC