W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > September 2004

slashdot sw thread

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:29:01 -0400
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040927202901.GD26763@homer.w3.org> 

 <Document rdf:about="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/27/1635257">
  <primaryTopic>
    <Document
rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/10/frauenfelder1004.asp"/>
  </primaryTopic>
</Document>

Might be worth mining for common (mis)conceptions about the SW.

eg. "this will never work 'cos people will lie/spam"
   "this is just Prolog"
   "people will never both creating the extra data"
   "full text works better than taxonomies" ...

[10 replies  beneath your current threshold.]

Dan
Received on Monday, 27 September 2004 20:29:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:12 GMT