There was some discussion at the recent telecon about what the OEP group might do related to units and measures. Possibilities include: 1. Conversion activity: Take a single [the best one, ideally] units and measures ontology and convert it. 2. Conduct a survey of existing ontologies for units and measures, a. Evaluation Activity: evaluate the various proposals b. Conversion activity: recommend the best one and convert it to OWL. 3. Adaptation/Creation activity: Adapt and improve the best existing ontology and have it be a formal recommendation. The only one of these activities that has a reasonable chance of success with modest effort is 1. However, unless someone feels confident to pick a good one, it will be some effort to survey existing ones first. I have a lot of experience with Gruber's ontology, and can say with high confidence that it is very good, and would be a perfectly reasonable place to start. It could be a stake in the ground, and others could critique/evolve/adapt it as they saw fit. As Deb G. said in the telecon today, the other two tasks are opening Pandora's box. It is a lot of work to do a good survey and even more work to take those results and start on an official recommendation for a units and measures ontology. I belive this kind of activity is OUT of scope for the SWBPD WG. It is also possible that converting the Gruber ontology into OWL might itself be a challenging task, once you start to think how to do thing the *best* way, as opposed to a straight-forward translation. MikeReceived on Thursday, 19 August 2004 19:15:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:12 GMT