W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sw-meaning@w3.org > October 2003

Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership]

From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:47:08 -0400
Message-ID: <3F8E934C.7050306@comcast.net>
To: public-sw-meaning@w3.org

Graham Klyne wrote:
> This idea of meaning being based in consensus also appears in the work 
> by Quine that I mentioned the other week [1].
> A possible difference in position would be that you talk about the 
> meaning of a URI, where Quine's analysis suggest that it's not the 
> individual terms but complete statements that have meaning.  (I think 
> that's a point that Pat has been trying to press, too.)

I think that individual terms _do_ have meaning for people.  For 
example, the word "gravity" certainly has meaning for me.  It may well 
be that my sense of its meaning comes mainly from a large collection of 
statments that I have heard or uttered in the past - along with personal 
experience - but nevertheless the term itself carries meaning for me.


Tom P
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 08:48:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:01 UTC