At 12:48 03/10/03 -0500, pat hayes wrote: >Rather than quarrel over the meaning of words that have no exact meaning >(like "meaning" for a start) or that some of us think have exact meanings >but others think are meaningless (like "resource"), why don't we try to >get a bit more precise about why we feel that something - ANYTHING - needs >to be said about this issue. If nobody can point to anything that is >likely to break if we say nothing, then the best thing to do is to agree >to say nothing. And if they can, then at least we will have some example >scenarios to help us focus discussion. A past point of contention has been the role of rdfs:comment in RDF. Does it convey any kind of "meaning", or none at all? #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Sunday, 5 October 2003 18:04:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:15 GMT