On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com> wrote: > Actually, 'font-family' seems to fit the intent of “external references” > in the document SVG Integration ( > https://svgwg.org/specs/integration/#definitions), though not explicitly > mentioned in the list of examples. > > Whether the external font file is “link[ed] to" with an explicit data > URI or an OS font family name (or one of the generic family names e.g. > serif, for that matter) shouldn’t make a difference, right? It’s still an > external blob that’s “render[ed] or process[ed] in the context of the > current file [the SVG doc of the SVG-in-OT font],” and should thus be > verboten (quotes are from the above link). > I don't think font-family is or should be considered an external reference. That would mean 'font-family:Arial' would be unusable in an SVG image, which would be bad. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 02:50:36 UTC