Thanks Tab.
I did notice that the conversion was happening like in HTML.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Rik Cabanier
<cabanier@adobe.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>,
"public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Date: 08/16/2013 01:05 PM
Subject: Re: agenda, 8 August 2013 SVG WG telcon
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger
<schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I am getting some concerns elsewhere in IBM from original SVG working
> group members about moving SVG attributes to lower case and it breaking
> older versions of SVG. How serious do and other members think this is
> given that a convergence with HTML should also mean adopting elements
like
> the <a> element?
How could it "[break] older versions of SVG"? There's no conflicts
created by the lowercasing, and what it really means is that attribute
and elements are case-folded into a canonical lowercase, like HTML
does. You can still write your attributes in camelCase if you'd like;
it's not an error.
~TYJ
