- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:05:27 -0700
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I am getting some concerns elsewhere in IBM from original SVG working > group members about moving SVG attributes to lower case and it breaking > older versions of SVG. How serious do and other members think this is > given that a convergence with HTML should also mean adopting elements like > the <a> element? How could it "[break] older versions of SVG"? There's no conflicts created by the lowercasing, and what it really means is that attribute and elements are case-folded into a canonical lowercase, like HTML does. You can still write your attributes in camelCase if you'd like; it's not an error. ~TYJ
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 18:06:14 UTC