W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: experimenting with different element summary box format

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:39:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAEeVwLfb6SKbySzc4=N1-0rH3XVS4ATX8oZowB48iV=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> I thought I would try something different with the blue element summary
> boxes:
>
>   http://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/shapes.html#RectElement
>   http://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#SVGElement
>
> As you can see, I've formatted it as a table, more like the property
> definition boxes.  I've also:
>
> * made the lists of element categories and elements (for the content model)
> and the attribute categories and individual attributes inline list
>
> * put the IDL right there
>
> I'm not sure how well it works.  It might be better if the element/attribute
> categories were still one per line, but the individual ones were in an
> inline list?

Ooh, +1 from me. I like all of the things being inline lists.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 07:40:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 August 2012 07:40:10 GMT