W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: commitments to work on SVG 2 features

From: Alex Danilo <adanilo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:39:46 +1100
Message-ID: <CAGdNekSEjMm4eam5HDnyPb92Tw++Zhev2dvZg09f8yGy-BD97w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cyril Concolato <Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au>
Cc: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Cyril,

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Cyril Concolato <
Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Following today's telcon, Nikos and I have worked on a new wiki page [1]
> to gather the commitments to work on the requirements. It should be more
> readable and easier to see what everyone will be working on. Please add
> your commitment as Cameron indicated to this page [1].
>

Looks great, good work!


> The page also indicates our guess, for each requirement, if a written
> proposal should be made or if someone can go and edit the spec
> (ACTION-3253). It should give a better understanding of the work to be done.
>
> The page was created based on other wiki pages and on previous
> resolutions. It may contain errors or miss requirements, hopefully not too
> many. For instance I don't know what to do with the <canvas> question that
> Alex raised [2]. So feel free, to add more with a link to a resolution and
> to fix the mistakes if any.
>

Not that troublemaker again:-)

Here's the mail thread I started last July by the looks of it, there are a
bunch of follow up
emails but it should give better context of the discussion:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2011Jul/0081.html

Cheers,
Alex


> Regards,
> Cyril
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Commitments
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2012JanMar/0081.html
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au]
> > Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 8:50 AM
> > To: SVG WG
> > Subject: commitments to work on SVG 2 features
> >
> > As we discussed in the telcon today, we are now (basically) at the point
> where
> > we want to prioritise the list of requirements we have for SVG 2, since
> we
> > obviously will not be able to work on all >100 accepted requirements
> within a
> > reasonable timeframe.  We will be doing this by having each of us, SVG WG
> > members, put our hands up to commit to working on specific requirements
> --
> > that includes developing a proposal (if one is required), doing spec
> edits, and
> > working on tests.  Cyril has placed "Commitment" below each accepted
> > requirement on
> > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input and
> > that's where you can put your name.
> >
> > Let's aim for having our commitments entered by next telcon, 29 March.
> >
> > Note that our timeframe we have on
> > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Planning_Page is to have a
> > LCWD by January 2013, so 9 months away.  Consider how many features you
> > will be able to drive to spec text completion by that time.  (Some
> feature
> > requests will obviously be more work than others, so make sure to take
> that
> > into consideration too.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cameron
>
> The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be
> confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with,
> disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If
> you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender
> by return email and delete the information from your system.
>
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 03:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:14 UTC