Hi Glenn. Glenn Adams: > I notice in the normative references section the reference: > > *[XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG]* > > @@fixme "An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile", M. Ishikawa editor, 9 August > 2002. Available at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG-20020809/ > > Will this referenced document go to REC prior to moving this PR to REC? No. > If not, then perhaps it should be changed to an informative reference, > since it would be bad form to publish a REC with a normative reference > to a W3C WD. Yes, it seems like this should be an informative reference, since none of SVG’s requirements are dependent on those in that document. Whether this is a change we can make now that the document is in PR is another question: Doug, do you know if this is OK? -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 22:02:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 June 2011 22:02:36 GMT