Modularization, DTD use and conformance

Hello all.

I’ve completed ACTION-2614 as follows:

  * I’ve moved the discussion on modularization from the Introduction
    chapter to the DTD appendix, so that it is less visible.
    http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdtd.html#Modularization

  * I’ve added a sub-section to the Modularization section suggesting
    methods other than DTD m12n should be used, like NVDL.
    http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdtd.html#PracticalConsiderations

  * I’ve reinstated the element/attribute content sets, since the
    discussion on m12n is lacking without them.  I’ve added them to the
    DTD appendix, though, so that they don’t clutter the main chapters.
    E.g.: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdtd.html#DTD.1.23

  * I’ve added a paragraph just beneath the introduction of the SVG
    DOCTYPE to state that it’s not recommended to use it in content.
    http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/intro.html#NamespaceAndDTDIdentifiers

  * I’ve updated the definition of a Conforming SVG Document Fragment to
    be more precise about how the DTD is to be used to assess validity.
    http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/conform.html#ConformingSVGDocuments

I would appreciate reviews of these changes.

Thanks,

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:55:44 UTC