W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Conformance classes

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:23:40 +1000
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090728062340.GA4474@arc.mcc.id.au>
SVG 1.1 defines a “Conforming SVG Document Fragment” and “Conforming SVG
Included Document Fragment” conformance class, among others.  I cannot
see a difference between these.  Is there one?  If not, can we drop
“Conforming SVG Included Document Fragment” and just make the point
about not allowing bare non-<svg> elements in the “Conforming SVG
Document Fragments” section?

Thanks,

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:24:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:24:38 GMT