- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:15:25 +0100
- To: "Niklas Hagelroth" <niklas.hagelroth@ikivo.com>, "SVG Working Group WG" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:13 +0200, Niklas Hagelroth <niklas.hagelroth@ikivo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, Ikivo pass struct-use-205 revision 1.6. > > I'm still not convinced that the 4th subtest that is moved to struct-use-210 is corrected. Can you please point me to the correct section in the specification that proves this test correct? I maintain that the struct-use-210 test is valid (even if it may be a bit tricky), and it was reviewed by a second WG member who also found it valid. > Also, since the test is so complicated and hard to find evidence for in the specification I would like to see links to the tested specification sections in the tests description. The normative definition for SVGElementInstance.correspondingUseElement is in SVG 1.1, which is linked to from the uDOM[1]. Also take note of the SVG 1.1 errata about liveness of DOM properties, which may play a part in this. Cheers /Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/svgudom.html#svg__SVGElementInstance -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 09:16:21 UTC