On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: > > Hi, Anne- > > Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 6/3/08 9:44 AM): >> On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:34 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> >> wrote: >>> The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for >>> reviewing the XMLHttpRequest LC draft. >>> >>> Please let us know if that is acceptable, >> I think I would rather just move on given how long the review >> period has been and how long we've been working on XMLHttpRequest >> Level 1, but that shouldn't preclude the SVG WG from providing >> feedback later on. > > Noted. But this is not an editorial decision, it is a WG decision. > > I don't see the harm in extending the LC period for a week or two: > the test suite is not done; there is no urgent release cycle for > implementations coming up; and the plan is to simply park this in CR > until HTML5 is more mature. So, I propose we honor this request. Given the length of time this spec has been in development and under review, I do not see a pressing need to extend LC. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 20:19:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 June 2008 20:19:34 GMT