W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-speech-api@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Clarify definition of resultIndex

From: Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:46:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEE5bcieyA7XPRpkkm2mB-8J9b+7TLCCrVHbnW4yyP3CS7ziww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Satish S <satish@google.com>
Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
Yes.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Satish S <satish@google.com> wrote:

> > this constraint is already inherent in the spec because only a single
> final result may be returned in continuous mode (5.1.1)
>
> I guess you meant to say "only a single final result may be returned in
> non-continuous mode"?
>
> Cheers
> Satish
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I propose eliminating from the definition of resultIndex the sentence:
>>     "When continuous was false, the resultIndex must always be 0."
>>
>> While this is true when returning the final result, this constraint is
>> already inherent in the spec because only a single final result may be
>> returned in continuous mode (5.1.1) and the results list must never contain
>> interim results before final results (5.1.8).
>>
>> However, it is not necessarily true when returning interim results (for
>> example, when only some of the interim results need to be overwritten).
>>
>> If there's no disagreement, I'll remove this sentence from the spec on
>> Tuesday.
>>
>> /Glen Shires
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 15:47:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:28 UTC