W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-speech-api@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Clarify definition of resultIndex

From: Satish S <satish@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:00:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHZf7RkgQqGboETB07MYLgx-j40f7tNikb3Ep9xGAqyrJ93-eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
> this constraint is already inherent in the spec because only a single
final result may be returned in continuous mode (5.1.1)

I guess you meant to say "only a single final result may be returned in
non-continuous mode"?

Cheers
Satish


On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote:

> I propose eliminating from the definition of resultIndex the sentence:
>     "When continuous was false, the resultIndex must always be 0."
>
> While this is true when returning the final result, this constraint is
> already inherent in the spec because only a single final result may be
> returned in continuous mode (5.1.1) and the results list must never contain
> interim results before final results (5.1.8).
>
> However, it is not necessarily true when returning interim results (for
> example, when only some of the interim results need to be overwritten).
>
> If there's no disagreement, I'll remove this sentence from the spec on
> Tuesday.
>
> /Glen Shires
>
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 09:01:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:28 UTC