Re: Wording changes to add clarity

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote:
> I propose the following changes in wording, which I believe do not change
> the intent or normative meaning, but add clarification.  If there's no
> disagreement, I will add these to the spec on Friday.
>
> result event
>   Substitute "See here[link to SpeechRecognitionEvent] for more
> information." with "The event MUST use the SpeechRecognitionEvent
> interface."
>
> nomatch event
>   Add "The event MUST use the SpeechRecognitionEvent interface."
>   Substitute "The result field..." with "The results field..."
>
> The stop method
>   Substitute "just the audio that it has received to date" with "just the
> audio that it has already received for this recognition."
>   Substitute "based on the audio that it has collected to date" with "based
> on the audio that it has already collected for this recognition."
>
> Also to be consistent in the headings of the definitions:
>   Substitute "The stop method" with "stop method" and elsewhere in headings
> where "The" is superfluous.
>   Add the word "attribute" to the headings that omit it, including sections
> 5.1.6, 5.1.7 and 5.1.8.

These all sound good to me. Thanks!

Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:44:00 UTC