Re: Wording changes to add clarity

One more I propose to change:

Rename addFromUri method to addFromURI  (we capitalize URI everywhere else
in the spec)

/Glen Shires

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote:
> > I propose the following changes in wording, which I believe do not change
> > the intent or normative meaning, but add clarification.  If there's no
> > disagreement, I will add these to the spec on Friday.
> >
> > result event
> >   Substitute "See here[link to SpeechRecognitionEvent] for more
> > information." with "The event MUST use the SpeechRecognitionEvent
> > interface."
> >
> > nomatch event
> >   Add "The event MUST use the SpeechRecognitionEvent interface."
> >   Substitute "The result field..." with "The results field..."
> >
> > The stop method
> >   Substitute "just the audio that it has received to date" with "just the
> > audio that it has already received for this recognition."
> >   Substitute "based on the audio that it has collected to date" with
> "based
> > on the audio that it has already collected for this recognition."
> >
> > Also to be consistent in the headings of the definitions:
> >   Substitute "The stop method" with "stop method" and elsewhere in
> headings
> > where "The" is superfluous.
> >   Add the word "attribute" to the headings that omit it, including
> sections
> > 5.1.6, 5.1.7 and 5.1.8.
>
> These all sound good to me. Thanks!
>