W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Turtle test suite finalized

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:10:37 -0700
Cc: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "public-sparql-dev@w3.org" <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "semantic-web@w3.org Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4D009826-F5F6-431F-8979-37959A672EAF@greggkellogg.net>
To: Jos De Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
On Aug 19, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Jos De Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com> wrote:

> Hi Gregg,
> 
> Thanks for the report.
> Not sure why the EYE reasoner EARL-report https://raw.github.com/RubenVerborgh/EyeEarl/earl/earl-report.ttl
> was not included in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html

Report updated with your latest results. Note that doap:name was set to "node-n3", which is used to display the name of the project; this conflicts with Ruben's node-n3 report; I took the liberty of changing it to "EYE", which was used in dc:title.

For those keeping score, we now have 9 fully conforming Turtle implementations. (SWObjects did not report on three bad evaluation tests, but from my understanding, it's not required for implementations to pass -bad tests to be considered conforming).

Gregg

> Maybe we had a too poor score at the time the report was generated:-)
> In the mean time all know issues are fixed and EYE passed 291 out of 291 tests.
> 
> I also want to thank RubenV and EricP again for their exellent help!
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Jos De Roo | Agfa HealthCare
> Senior Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo
> http://twitter.com/josderoo
> 
> Agfa HealthCare NV, Moutstraat 100, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
> http://www.agfa.com/healthcare
> 
> -----Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote: -----
> To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "public-sparql-dev@w3.org" <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>
> From: Gregg Kellogg 
> Sent by: Gregg Kellogg 
> Date: 08/11/2013 02:57AM
> Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, Jos De Roo/AMDUS/AGFA@AGFA, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Turtle test suite finalized
> 
> I've integrated the EARL results reported by Ruben, Greg, Peter, Andy, Jos and myself into the rollup EARL report [1]. Previous reports were submitted by David Robillard (Serd) and Alex Milowski (Green Turtle), which are not included in this version of the report. Updated reports, and any additional reports are welcome and may be included in the transition request if they are received before freezing for submission.
> 
> The CR Comments Wiki page [2] has also been updated with current implementation status.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations
> 
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Please re-submit implementations reports for Turtle so you can
>>  1. Help us push Turtle to final Recommendation status.
>>  2. Raise public awareness of your implementation.
>> The tests are listed in a manifest.ttl file at
>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/>
>> 
>> Reports are in a language called EARL and should look like [[
>>  @prefix doap: <http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#>.
>>  @prefix earl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#>.
>>  @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>.
>>  @prefix test: <http://swobjects.org/test_Turtle-WG.sh>.
>>  @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>.
>>  @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>.
>>  @prefix t: <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl#>.
>> 
>>  <> foaf:primaryTopic <@@my program> ;
>>  	dct:issued "@@datetime"^^xsd:dateTime ;
>>  	foaf:maker <@@your foaf page> .
>> 
>>  <@@my program>
>>  	a doap:Project ;
>>  	doap:name "SWObjects" ;
>>  	doap:homepage <http://swobjects.org/> .
>> 
>>  <@@your foaf page> a foaf:Person ;
>>  	foaf:name "@@your name" ;
>>  	foaf:mbox <mailto:@@your email> ;
>>  	foaf:homepage <@@your homepage> .
>> ]]
>> followed by an EARL assertion for each test, a la [[
>>  [] a earl:Assertion ; earl:test t:IRI_subject ; earl:subject <@@my program> ; earl:assertedBy test: ; earl:result [ earl:outcome earl:@@passed/failed; dct:date '@@datetime'^^xsd:dateTime ] .
>> ]] Please see
>> <http://kasei.us/code/rdf-trine/rdf-trine-turtle-2013-03-01.ttl>
>> for an example.
>> 
>> The CR comments wiki page has a list of currently submitted
>> implementations, but those will need to be re-run with this final
>> version of the tests.
>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations>
>> 
>> -- 
>> -ericP
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 18:11:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:52 UTC