Unless there are significant objections, I don't see why not. I think it's sufficiently close to SPARQL to count as "SPARQL-dev" Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Richard Newman <mailto:rnewman@franz.com> > Date: 9 March 2007 16:47 > > I like the look of this. > > Is this the appropriate forum for discussions, Andy? (Presumably I'll > have *something* to say when I study it in detail!) > > Thanks, > > -R > > > On 9 Mar 2007, at 5:29 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > > > A proposal for a SPARQL/Update language: > > > > http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/SPARQL-Update.html > > > > AndyReceived on Friday, 9 March 2007 17:11:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:05 GMT