- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 11:05:37 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- CC: Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>, "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Hi Harry, On 05/15/2015 09:29 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > OK everyone, > > While I understand Tantek's skepticism, I think a document that helps > clarifies. In my experience, raising issues and edits around a single > document is often a pretty good way to make progress. +1 > > I'll take a first stab at this next week in order to get a general > W3C-compliant outline and put it in the Github repo, and then I'll setup > Aaron and Jessica as editors (Amy - can you still help?). We can discuss > more on the Tuesday call, and also make sure the SoLiD approach is well > represented. During F2F I understood that Amy (and in few months together with Ann) will act as neutral editors. While editors of three other drafts will act as authors. Here I must admit that I don't understand well editor/author distinction... BTW can you please propose it for the agenda of our next telecon via wiki? https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-19 Cheers!
Received on Sunday, 17 May 2015 09:05:45 UTC