RE: Activity Streams Vocabulary

On 22 Sep 2014 at 11:33, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 12:34 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>> After discussing it, Our proposal is to:
>> 
>> A. Define a formal Activity and Actions Ontology based on [2].
>> B. Define a requirement that all implementations MUST at least support
>> a JSON-LD serialization of this Ontology.
>> C. Model the Actions Ontology after the approach currently taken by
>> schema.org/Actions but without actually copying or using the
>> schema.org vocabulary.
> 
> Sounds like reasonable way to keep on moving forward! I'll do what I can
> to look on how it aligns with concepts existing in
> http://schema.org/docs/actions.html
> 
> I also hope Markus Lanthaler can support modeling Actions with his
> experience from ongoing work on Hydra and contributions to
> Schema.org/Action design (see attribution in
> http://blog.schema.org/2014/04/announcing-schemaorg-actions.html )

Sure! I'll try to help/contribute where I can.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 09:51:18 UTC