- From: Tim Anglade <tim.anglade@af83.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:31:03 +0100
- To: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
Hi Dan, everybody, great work on the document. I'm still reading through the finer parts of it but I have the feeling it's a statement of purpose everybody can or will be able to agree on with few, if any adjustments. While agreeable, I'm a bit leery that this document does not go far enough in helping us organize ourselves. This document may be fine as a charter but if we agree to take it as such, what next? Where do we go from there? Would we draft some other document to help flesh out areas of work and deliverables (I thought we agreed on being deliverable-oriented in this XG)? Would that be based on the UnifiedSocialXG document, with refinements as necessary from the survey and tonight's telecon? Or do you recommend we start with that charter alone and let work self-organize afterwards through telecons and mailing-list exchanges? I guess my question is (and that's a question for everybody on the list as well): what does the rest of the proposal entail if and once we accept some revision of an uncomplicated document like this one? Cheers, Tim - - - - - - - Tim Anglade | directeur, pôle « Turbulences » | af83 42, boulevard de Sébastopol | 75003 Paris | France 1436, Howard St | San Francisco | CA 94103 | USA Tel : +33 1 42 72 33 32 Mob : +33 6 35 92 77 58 skype : tim_anglade Web : www.af83.com This email is: [X] bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 11:32:41 UTC