W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-social-web-talk@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Invited expert - Change of policy?

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:36:56 +0100
Message-ID: <b3be92a00904090136q31efeac8r8163c2ea13a4b3b5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mauro Nunez <mauro@w3.org>
Cc: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, public-social-web-talk@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mauro Nunez <mauro@w3.org> wrote:

> On Apr 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:


> Hi Harry, et al
> Yes, this is exactly how we would like to handle the participation at the
> Social Web XG.  We will grant Public Invited Expert status to almost anyone
> who applies, securing this way a broad participation but at the same time
> allowing the Chairs to clearly identify the level of commitment.
> Public Invited Experts do not have access to Member resources.  This should
> not be a problem since per charter, you are planning to conduct your work in
> public, i.e. using public-xg-socialweb@w3.org and archived in public space
> [1].

Mauro, as I'd like to actually see this XG start having telecons and working
on deliverables rather quickly, does this also mean that

1) We can conduct our work on a public list open to those who aren't Invited
Experts, but make sure that any work on the actual phrasing of the
deliverable be done by Members or Invited Experts so that the deliverables
recommend RF only technology (this being done by the cc'ing technique
described earlier) [1]


2) Our "public" list only be composed of those who are Members and Invited
Experts  [2].



> Best,
> Mauro
> Incubator Activity Lead
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 08:37:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:51:48 UTC