W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > September 2010

Fwd: Re: [Uri-review] New posting of the "jms" URI scheme

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:38:41 -0700
Message-ID: <4C978E11.9060508@tibco.com>
To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
  One point of feedback so far....

-Eric.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Uri-review] New posting of the "jms" URI scheme
Date: 	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:14:24 +0200
From: 	Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: 	Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
CC: 	uri-review@ietf.org



* Eric Johnson wrote:
>   Darts welcome:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-merrick-jms-uri-09
>
>This version addresses a bunch of concerns raised privately in email by
>members of the IETF, mostly around the question of how to compare two
>"jms" URIs, as well as removing non-normative uses of RFC 2119 language.

It might be a good idea to specify whether (and if, how) white space in
parameter names and values (and so on) is significant. The identifiers
can apparently get rather long, and some implementations might ignore
for instance the space in `jms:x:y?z=%20example` to accomodate people
wrapping the identifiers (similarily, %00 and %0A may be an issue).
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 16:38:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:24 GMT