- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:44:47 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5720
John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |johnarwe@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #7 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> 2008-06-16 15:44:46 ---
4.2.5
then model processors MUST NOT [attempt to recognize any reference schemes in
it and MUST NOT] attempt to resolve it.
The portion enclosed in [] was deleted according to the diff. It should not
have been. Since we still use "recognize" in the context of ref schemes
(4.2.1, 4.2.2) I tend to think the deletion was accidental.
Proposal: restore the text in []
4.1.3 the new clause in item 2 (between the commas) is pretty tortured.
from (with context):
An SML reference is unresolved if and only if all of the following is true:
1. It is a non-null SML reference.
2. None of the recognized reference schemes , of which the SML
reference is recognized as an instance, resolves to an element in the model.
Proposal: replace 2 with
2. None of the reference schemes the SML reference is recognized as using
resolves to an element in the model.
The rest looks fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 15:45:23 UTC