Re: Ontologies versioning?

Semantic versioning with all its rules becomes quite messy to use IMHO.

Suggest using a simpler 'Accretion' versioning method. If you update the
ontology, it simply gets a new version number - no major/minor/patch
complexity.

Updates can be in the form of:
- new terms added
- terms deprecated
- term updated (without changing the meaning) - labels, comments,
descriptions, ...
- when meaning of a term changes, the existing term is deprecated, and new
term added
- ...

cheers
Sivaram


______________________
Sivaram Arabandi, MD, MS

ONTOPRO
W:  http://ontopro.com/
Ph: 832.726.2322

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Clement Jonquet <jonquet@lirmm.fr> wrote:

> Hello Erick, all,
>
>
>
> Good metadata tells you everything:
>
> http://bit.ly/2aCuSWi
>
>
>
> Ctrl+F “version” on the file to see the properties than could be used for
> versioning.
>
>
>
> Bye
>
> Clement
>
>
>
> Dr. *Clement JONQUET*  -
> *PhD in Informatics  -  Assistant ProfessorUniversity of Montpellier*
>
> *Coordinator of the SIFR <http://www.lirmm.fr/sifr/> and AgroPortal
> <http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/> projects*
>
> *Visiting scholar, Stanford University (EU Marie Curie fellow)*
>
>
>
> jonquet@lirmm.fr
>
> http://www.lirmm.fr/~jonquet
>
>
>
> @Montpellier : +33/4 67 14 97 43 <+33%204%2067%2014%2097%2043>
>
> @Stanford       : +1 650 723 6725 <(650)%20723-6725>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Erick Antezana [mailto:erick.antezana@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* lundi 23 janvier 2017 01:57
> *À :* HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> *Objet :* Ontologies versioning?
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I am reviewing the way we version our ontologies hosted in-house (where we
> hold public ontologies as well as internal ontologies).
>
>
>
> I am looking for pointers (e.g. guidelines, best practices) in terms of
> ontologies versioning. Could you recommend any?
>
>
>
> thanks!
>
> Erick Antezana
>

Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 15:27:05 UTC