W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2014

Re: License unknown

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:22:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=T3B0WrUx+qaH_A5DNXPzbYra_=gj_puY2Z9VbF2Soktw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, HCLS IG <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
A boolean is good enough to set a class from:

Class: OpenLicenseData
EquivalentClass: hasOpenLicense value true

Class: ClosedLicenseData
EquivalentClass: hasOpenLicense value false

It makes the properties more specific, sure, but it's more than enough to
go on in many situations.


On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>

> On 23 June 2014 06:37, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In the case that the license is not asserted it distinguishes the case
>> where the publisher has made an affirmative effort to determine what the
>> license is, or not.
>   I cannot fathom how this could be inferred from the truth value of a bit.

Jim McCusker

Data Scientist
5AM Solutions

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 15:23:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:09 UTC