W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2014

Re: License unknown

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:26:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFKQJ8m+aDuxupxTH9kS-g8034fH5coM9gn_UHVVAW9=_0G8ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Cc: Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>, Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, HCLS IG <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Yes. And the understandability of the class is just as dependent on the
documentation as understanding the property.
-Alan


On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote:

> A boolean is good enough to set a class from:
>
> Class: OpenLicenseData
> EquivalentClass: hasOpenLicense value true
>
> Class: ClosedLicenseData
> EquivalentClass: hasOpenLicense value false
>
> It makes the properties more specific, sure, but it's more than enough to
> go on in many situations.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23 June 2014 06:37, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In the case that the license is not asserted it distinguishes the case
>>> where the publisher has made an affirmative effort to determine what the
>>> license is, or not.
>>>
>>   I cannot fathom how this could be inferred from the truth value of a
>> bit.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jim McCusker
>
> Data Scientist
>  5AM Solutions
> jmccusker@5amsolutions.com
> http://5amsolutions.com
>
> PhD Student
> Tetherless World Constellation
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
> http://tw.rpi.edu
>
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 15:27:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:09 UTC