W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2011

Re: My task from last week: Semantic free identifiers

From: Joanne Luciano (gmail) <jluciano@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:50:59 -0400
Cc: Mark <markw@illuminae.com>, Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>, Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, "cc \"Sivaram Arabandi, MD\"" <sivaram.arabandi@gmail.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, "andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)" <andrea.splendiani@rothamsted.ac.uk>, "MMVagnoni@mdanderson.org" <MMVagnoni@mdanderson.org>, James Malone <malone@ebi.ac.uk>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Message-Id: <C6CD2B77-61BC-4FB1-AEAD-010BF85A97D6@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
Nice presentation Adrian. 

On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Adrian Walker wrote:

> Oops... Bad link correction:
> 
> Slides 51-52 of www.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf
> 
> Apologies,  -- Adrian
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Sorry to come in so late to this discussion but....
> 
> It would seem that the meaning that resides in the application (or in a SPARQL query) should be part of the discussion.  Even if the data identifiers have really fine readable meanings, an application can change the semantics completely.  And, unless there are explanations of what the app has done, no-one will be any the wiser unless the error is egregious (eg -- the Eiffel tower is a dog).  
> 
> Slides 51-52 of [1] are an attempt to diagram a way of dealing with app semantics and data semantics together. 
> 
>                              -- Adrian
> 
> [1] ww.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf
>                    
> Internet Business Logic
> A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A over SQL and RDF
> Online at www.reengineeringllc.com    
> Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements
> 
> Adrian Walker
> Reengineering
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mark <markw@illuminae.com> wrote:
> 
> If you want to work with a more sophisticated API - I might suggest the OWL API. It's more powerful, but also more sophisticated
> 
> 
> +++++++++1!!
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 10:51:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:47 UTC