W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2011

Re: My task from last week: Semantic free identifiers

From: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:26:01 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTimv7VkiAWNts0Vmpg=gCH1Pq6mKWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark <markw@illuminae.com>, Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>, Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, "cc \"Sivaram Arabandi, MD\"" <sivaram.arabandi@gmail.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, "andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)" <andrea.splendiani@rothamsted.ac.uk>, "MMVagnoni@mdanderson.org" <MMVagnoni@mdanderson.org>, James Malone <malone@ebi.ac.uk>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Oops... Bad link correction:

Slides 51-52 of
www.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf

Apologies,  -- Adrian


On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Sorry to come in so late to this discussion but....
>
> It would seem that the meaning that resides in the application (or in a
> SPARQL query) should be part of the discussion.  Even if the data
> identifiers have really fine readable meanings, an application can change
> the semantics completely.  And, unless there are explanations of what the
> app has done, no-one will be any the wiser unless the error is egregious (eg
> -- the Eiffel tower is a dog).
>
> Slides 51-52 of [1] are an attempt to diagram a way of dealing with app
> semantics and data semantics together.
>
>                              -- Adrian
>
> [1]
> ww.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf
>
> Internet Business Logic
> A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A over SQL
> and RDF
> Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
> Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements
>
> Adrian Walker
> Reengineering
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mark <markw@illuminae.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>  If you want to work with a more sophisticated API - I might suggest the
>>> OWL API. It's more powerful, but also more sophisticated
>>>
>>
>>
>> +++++++++1!!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 11:26:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:47 UTC