W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > April 2011

Fwd: Quality Criteria for SKOS vocabularies

From: M. Scott Marshall <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:48:24 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimnB9VRmxp55YziTrXpC+J=5s6pCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
FYI - These documents/links below could be part of the ongoing
discussion about improving the quality of RDF for life sciences data.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Annika Flemming <annika.flemming@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Quality Criteria for SKOS vocabularies
To: Christian Mader <christian.mader@univie.ac.at>
Cc: public-lod@w3.org, chris@bizer.de


Hi Christian,

nice work! As you mentioned my draft about Linked Data quality, you
might be interested in my finished thesis, which can be found here:
http://tinyurl.com/diplom-af
It's written in German.

Cheers,
Annika

Am 11.04.2011 08:46, schrieb Christian Mader:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the course of my PhD project at the University of Vienna I'm going to address the question how to programmatically support collaborative creation of "good-quality" SKOS vocabularies. I have found 14 criteria that, in my opinion, could be used to assess the quality of said vocabularies. It would be really helpful for me to get some community input on these criteria, so I published them here:
>
> https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Criteria-for-SKOS-Vocabularies
>
> Please feel free to post your comments and suggestions regarding that matter, every kind of input will be warmly appreciated.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 09:48:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:01 GMT