W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ?

From: Erick Antezana <erant@psb.vib-ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:07:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47396.157.193.202.129.1235722021.squirrel@webmail.psb.ugent.be>
To: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Kei,

  would it be possible to get your slides? do you know if the material
disucussed during the C-SHALS will be available?

thanks,
Erick

> I gave the following neuroscience URI examples in my biordf talk at
> C-SHALS yesterday.
>
> http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dopamine_receptor
> http://purl.org/ycmi/senselab/neuron_ontology.owl#Dopaminergic_Receptor
> http://purl.org/nif/ontology/NIF-Molecule.owl#nifext_5832
>
> I pointed out that the last one might be a possible solution. There
> might be hope. :-)
>
> -Kei
>
>
> Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>>So I count three different sets of URIs for NCBI taxonomy so far. :(
>>-Alan
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Chris Mungall <cjm@berkeleybop.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>also..
>>>
>>>part of the NCBI taxonomy is in NIF Organism:
>>>
>>>http://ontology.neuinfo.org/NIF/BiomaterialEntities/NIF-Organism.owl
>>>
>>>See also:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.neuinfo.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/NIFSTDoverview
>>> http://neuinfo.org
>>>
>>>
>>>On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:17 PM, andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>It'2 240M, but compressed is only 9.
>>>>I wonder whether there is some architecture to transparently transfer
>>>>compressed ontologies...
>>>>
>>>>Ciao,
>>>>Andrea
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjm@berkeleybop.org]
>>>>Sent: 25 February 2009 20:53
>>>>To: andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
>>>>Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
>>>>Subject: Re: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>I was looking for an NCBI Taxnomoy in OWL, but I didn't find it (or
>>>>>better, could find fragment from other projects...)
>>>>>
>>>>>What is strange though, is that on the obo foundry website
>>>>>(berkeleybop.org/ontologies) there are notes on the ncbi taxonomy
>>>>>representation in owl... but not the representation itself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Temporarily dropped from the summary page but still available at the
>>>>usual URL
>>>>http://purl.org/obo/owl/NCBITaxon
>>>>
>>>>(warning: large..)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Does anybody have some hint about where I can fin an OWL version ?
>>>>>Or even an RDF version ? Even better would a sparql endpoint
>>>>>containing it...
>>>>>
>>>>>best,
>>>>>Andrea Splendiani
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 17:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:54 GMT