W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2008

Re: URI note

From: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:45:43 -0400
To: eric neumann <ekneumann@gmail.com>
Cc: kc28@email.med.yale.edu, Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Message-id: <483C72F7.5010904@yale.edu>

Eric,

Yes, I remember how much work was involved in writing last year's BMC-TR 
paper. I didn't mean we're immediately ready for writing another big 
paper. I'm more looking to the future. If we can establish a high 
quality of work/collaboration, we can then aim at writing paper(s)  for 
submission to top journal(s). I hope this will also serve a motivational 
force for people (not just academic people) who're interested in 
publications.

I agree that semantic web needs actions now. For example, as mentioned 
in the SenseLab note (future directions), we are interested in working 
with the community to expand "entrez neuron", which was started as a 
collaboration with CCDB (SenseLab and CCDB are part of NIF), to query 
and integrate multiple semantic web datasets provided by different 
neuroscience data sources.

Just my 2 cents ...

-Kei

eric neumann wrote:
> Kei,
>
> Recollecting how much back and forth went into writing last year's 
> BMC-TR paper, and we didn't even go into any actual demonstration 
> descriptions, I think it would be highly unlikely for the HCLS to 
> write a paper of the caliber that Nature Biotechnology would demand.
>
> However, if somehow a few of the groups participating in HCLS 
> developed their own local SW data-knowledge content, published these 
> on the web, AND then could be used collectively to view and query 
> connected open knowledge, then this indeed would be impressive enough 
> to merit a collaboration paper. 
>
> My feeling is that a lot of folks in the life science research world 
> are waiting to see if something like this will be done...
>
> Eric
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, <kc28@email.med.yale.edu 
> <mailto:kc28@email.med.yale.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     Quoting Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at <mailto:samwald@gmx.at>>:
>
>     > Maybe we/you could turn it into a journal publication / review?
>     I guess that
>     > would cause a sudden increase of interest by HCLSIG members with
>     an academic
>     > background :)
>     >
>
>     It would be nice if HCLSIG can produce a paper (or more than one
>     paper) in a
>     prestigious journal like Nature Biotechnology. A strong scientific
>     use case may
>     help.
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     -Kei
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 20:46:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:36 UTC