W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2008

Re: GO as RDF properties

From: Talapady Bhat <talapady.bhat@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:26 -0400
Message-ID: <007101c885d8$d22688b0$83c20681@campus.nist.gov>
To: "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
Cc: "Robert N. Goldberg" <robert.goldberg@nist.gov>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

Hi,

We have the thermodata built by Robert Goldberg over the last 30 years and 
let me ask him what does he think about the project.

Thanks

T N Bhat
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
To: "Talapady Bhat" <talapady.bhat@nist.gov>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: GO as RDF properties


> Hi Talapady,
>
>> Why not use EC number to denote enzyme and use GO as an alias? EC numbers
>> are far more popular and more universily known to other databases for
>> exchange of information.
>
> This is for internal use, and I am using GO in my databases here.
>
>> Also why not use thermodynamics data as well ?
>
> Actually, I am not trying to create an all-encompassing model yet. I
> have a set of very sparse data that I want to get into RDF. In some
> cases all I have is the enzyme and an inhibitor - not even the
> substrates. By fitting it all to RDF I was hoping to be able to merge
> this data with other sources later. If there is thermodynamic info I
> will hopefully be able to bolt it on afterwards.
>
> Tore
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson ad po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
>
>
> 
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 13:40:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:35 UTC