W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > April 2008

Re: URI note snapshot available

From: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:54:15 +0200
Message-ID: <FF6B4C5C0B2D4537BFBAFF02337DB4FB@tessellate>
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "Leo Sauermann" <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>

Dear Jonathan,

Currently, the 'URI-based naming systems for science' document draft [1] 
does not mention or discuss the 'Cool URIs for the Semantic Web' document 
[2]. Should there not be at least a little bit of discussion about this 
other document? I think an analysis of the approaches taken by the life 
science community compared to the SWEO/linked data community could be 
interesting.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/

Cheers,
Matthias Samwald
DERI Galway, Ireland // Semantic Web Company, Austria
http://www.deri.ie/
http://www.semantic-web.at/



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: URI note snapshot available


>
> I've been posting revisions to the URI note to the same location:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/
>
> If you're planning on attending the next HCLS meeting/telecon  (Monday?) 
> please take a look as the meeting approaches. Otherwise,  comments are 
> welcome, but I suggest you read it now only if you also  plan on reading a 
> later draft, as significantly more work will be  done on it over the next 
> few days.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
>
>> Some of you may have heard that the URI note has been revised since
>> the last public draft last October.  This is indeed the case, and its
>> authors are working on polishing the new version.  If you would like
>> to examine a snapshot of our work it is available here:
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/
>>
>> It's still in a state of high flux so we're can't promise to act on or
>> even respond to comments right now.  We plan to give you further  drafts
>> for review over the coming week and after.
>>
>> Best
>> Jonathan
> 
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 17:55:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:33 UTC