- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:10:50 -0400
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- Cc: Chris Mungall <cjm@fruitfly.org>, public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Maybe. You could use the examples on the macros page I pointed to to test your theory. -Alan On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Matthias Samwald wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 23:53 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> http://code.google.com/p/owl1-1/wiki/MacrosAndSyntax >> >> In other words, instead of coming up with a single way of saying some >> subset of OWL DL in simpler triples, define a language for creating >> such mappings. > > If the main motivation is to create a mapping language between the > 'complicated', standard OWL-in-RDF representation and a simplified > OWL-in-RDF representation, I think a set of SPARQL construct > queries or > SWRL rules might already be sufficient. > > -- Matthias >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 08:11:00 UTC