W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2007

Re: BioRDF Telcon

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:44:53 -0400
Message-Id: <82A45DE5-1E2A-4B64-BA27-BA195414BC4D@creativecommons.org>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
To: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>

Well, I didn't quite mean it like that. I meant, should this document  
have a separate section containing detailed use cases. I think not -  
instead I'd rather just have plenty of examples in the running text  
(missing right now).  Let me know if you think otherwise, and if so  
tell me what sort of use case would be useful. I'm sorry to say I  
didn't find the existing use case page for this task [1] to be very  
helpful.

Examples are hard, probably the most difficult part of writing  any  
methods report such as this one. Specific suggestions would be  
appreciated.

Jonathan

1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/ 
URI_Best_Practices/Use_Cases

On Oct 8, 2007, at 3:41 AM, Eric Jain wrote:

> Jonathan Rees wrote:
>> OK, BioRDF, here's my draft, such as it is.  Still quite sketchy in
>> some places but I think it's beginning to converge.
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/ 
>> URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations/SputnikDraft
>
> Looks good :-)
>
> Just one comment:
>
> "is there any reason to talk about use cases?"
>
> I'd say yes, discussing the practical implications of different  
> approaches should make the document a lot more relevant, for many  
> people!
>
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 13:44:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:50 GMT