Michel_Dumontier wrote: > Sure, HTTP URIs can be used > as identifiers, but why would I mint arbitrary HTTP URIs when I can use > a scheme that has no resolution protocol implicitly or explicitly > associated with it? Indeed, especially since at the moment HTTP URIs will cost you at least 5 cents a piece, whereas non-HTTP URIs may go for as little as 2 cents each! In any case, the most practical non-HTTP URIs that are in use at the moment seem to be LSIDs and DOIs; both have an associated resolution protocol...Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 15:28:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:42 GMT