W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2006

Re: CANCELLED Oct 26 Teleconference Agenda - modelling 'optional' attributes and default value

From: <helen.chen@agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:34:19 -0400
To: eneumann@teranode.com
Cc: "W3C HCLSIG" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1DD279CD.770ECB81-ON85257213.004C4038-85257213.00500AF7@agfa.com>
 Hi, Eric

Then we have done this action item :)

But I have another issues in the similar domain: when 'lifting" HL7 CDA 
(clinical document architecture) XSD to OWL ontology and mapping to RIM 
Ontology.  I don't know how to handle the "optional" attributes and their 
default values, e.g.

<xs:attribute name="classCode" type="ActClassObservation" use="optional" 
default="OBS"/>

I am told it can not be done in OWL, but I saw TBL's notes on "expressing 
default value using log:semantics and log:notIncludes" [1]. I appreciate 
if Alan or anyone can share experiences if they had encountered a similar 
problem.

Thanks. 

Helen. 

[1]  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Reach#Implementi





"Eric Neumann" <eneumann@teranode.com> 
Sent by: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
10/26/2006 06:49 AM

To
"Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
cc
"W3C HCLSIG" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Subject
Re: CANCELLED Oct 26 Teleconference Agenda








Alan,

Based on the notes (http://www.w3.org/2006/10/03-hcls-minutes.html), there 
was a discussion on HL7 qualifiers, and that perhaps Helen should consider 
using Enumerated classes instead of controlled vocab. This was new to her, 
and you had stated you would explain it to her-- hence the action item to 
ensure she was pointed to the proper material for assessing enumerated owl 
classes. 

It's actually a small item, just to make sure she can apply your 
insights....

Eric
 

On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:



                 On Oct 25, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Eric Neumann wrote:

                                 Please be aware of your upcoming tasks 
commitments (http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/F2F/Actions), and which ones 
will be discussed during the intro of the HCLS workshop at ISWC (Nov 6).


                 Regarding this, Helen and I don't really know how it came 
about that we have the following action item?

                 Helen Chen and Alan Ruttenberg: Assess whether enumerable 
classes can be used to handle controlled vocabularies ala HL7 qualifiers.

                 We hadn't discussed it at the f2f. Do you know the 
genesis of this?

                 -Alan






Eric Neumann, PhD
co-chair, W3C Healthcare and Life Sciences,
and Senior Director Product Strategy
Teranode Corporation
411 1st Avenue South, Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98104
+1 (781)856-9132
www.teranode.com 
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 14:34:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:45 GMT