W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2006

Re: CANCELLED Oct 26 Teleconference Agenda

From: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:49:46 -0400
Message-ID: <1598BAB860DC6D499401911600DFD3E06BB471@MI8NYCMAIL16.Mi8.com>
To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
cc: "W3C HCLSIG" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>


Based on the notes (http://www.w3.org/2006/10/03-hcls-minutes.html), there was a discussion on HL7 qualifiers, and that perhaps Helen should consider using Enumerated classes instead of controlled vocab. This was new to her, and you had stated you would explain it to her-- hence the action item to ensure she was pointed to the proper material for assessing enumerated owl classes. 

It's actually a small item, just to make sure she can apply your insights....


On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

	On Oct 25, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Eric Neumann wrote:

		Please be aware of your upcoming tasks commitments (http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/F2F/Actions), and which ones will be discussed during the intro of the HCLS workshop at ISWC (Nov 6).

	Regarding this, Helen and I don't really know how it came about that we have the following action item?

	Helen Chen and Alan Ruttenberg: Assess whether enumerable classes can be used to handle controlled vocabularies ala HL7 qualifiers.

	We hadn't discussed it at the f2f. Do you know the genesis of this?


Eric Neumann, PhD
co-chair, W3C Healthcare and Life Sciences,
and Senior Director Product Strategy
Teranode Corporation
411 1st Avenue South, Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98104
+1 (781)856-9132
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 10:50:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:28 UTC