- Michael, > http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/05-09-08.pdf > > Because it is still being evaluated, this might only be > available from the OMG website to OMG members. Thanks. I was able to get the document. Though haven't read through yet, it is too long ( closed to 300 pages ) but I spotted one heading from the document: 8.2 Why Not Simply Use or Extend the UML 2.0 Metamodel? To me, it implies that RDF != UML 4.0? XiaoshuReceived on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:24:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:32 GMT