W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2006

RE: [BioRDF] Meeting Notes Feb 27, 2006

From: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta) <Michael_Miller@Rosettabio.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:29:09 -0800
To: wangxiao@musc.edu, "public-semweb-lifesci" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1FEV8c-0006kL-H2@lisa.w3.org>

Hi Xiaoshu,

http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/05-09-08.pdf

Because it is still being evaluated, this might only be available from
the OMG website to OMG members.

It is a very thorough document, well thought out.  They worked with many
of the W3C OWL and RDF experts.

cheers,
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Xiaoshu Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:17 AM
> To: 'public-semweb-lifesci'
> Subject: RE: [BioRDF] Meeting Notes Feb 27, 2006
> 
> 
> 
> > > So RDF = UML 4.0? :-)
> > 
> > At the OMG there is a proposed Ontology Definition Metamodel 
> > that IBM and SandPiper are submitting that takes an excellent 
> > look at this issue.
> 
> Do you have the URI for that.  I am actually kind of 
> suspicious of, but of
> course anxious to see, the validity of the approach.  
> Although OMG is trying
> to avoid being tied with Objected-Oriented.  But UML is based 
> on OO, which
> has a closed-world semantics.  I wonder how it can handle the 
> open-world
> semantics without breaking existing OO paradigm.
> 
> Xiaoshu 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:29:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:25 UTC