W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > January 2006

RE: Lack of prefix in public-semweb-lifesci Subject line makes it difficult to recognize origin

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevron.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:17:12 -0600
Message-ID: <0C237C50B244FD44BE47B8DCE23A3052011C6251@HOU150NTXC2MC.hou150.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Carole Goble" <carole@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Eric Neumann" <eneumann@alum.mit.edu>
cc: "hclsig-pub" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

Forming, storming, norming, performing ... Adjourning. 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Carole Goble
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:19 PM
To: Eric Neumann
Cc: hclsig-pub
Subject: Re: [public-semweb-lifesci, meta-discussion] RE: Lack of prefix
in public-semweb-lifesci Subject line makes it difficult to recognize
origin


Eric

you know, this is just such good fuel for my next Montagues and Capulets
revisited talk. On both sides.
And now - I shall delete all the emails and wait for some Semantic Web
and Life Science discussion.
Please?

Carole

>Phil,
>
>I think that is a very constructive suggestion... 
>
>cheers,
>Eric
>
>--- Phillip Lord <Phillip.Lord@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
>  
>
>>Rather than getting into a "my discipline's better than your 
>>discipline"
>>competion, can we just accept that the sysadmins have got the right to

>>administer their mailing list how they want and move on? I guess that
>>
>>might be able to argue that the ability to organise and navigate 
>>through your email is a semantic web issue, it would probably be 
>>easier if we could move forward from this mailing list 
>>meta-discussion.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Phil
>>
>>
>>    
>>
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:19:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:41 GMT