W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2006

RE: GRDDL

From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:27:05 -0500
To: "'HCLS HCLS'" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c633e7$5f5f2250$66741780@BIOXIAO>

> Xiaoshu et al.
> 
> Do you have any perspective on the relation of RDF/A proposal 
> to GRDDL, and how the two might relate/interoperate?

I have asked the same question to Pat Hayes[1], so I don't have a good
answer.  

But at the current state, I would prefer GRDDL to RDF/A.  The reason is that
using RDF/A would break the validity of X/HTML document. Unless W3C goes to
the miles to add the RDF/A support, using RDF/A means writing invalid-HTML
documents.  But from the point of ease of use, RDF/A is a winer.  As I said
before, XSLT, required by the GRDDL, is quite complex, it is not for the
faint of heart.

Xiaoshu

1.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Feb/0012.html
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 17:27:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:42 GMT