W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2006

RE: [HCLSIG] homologs for yeast proteins?

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:43:13 -0600
Message-Id: <p06230919c006cc2df939@[]>
To: "wangxiao" <wangxiao@musc.edu>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

>>  Seems like RDF/A should be relevant here. It will be a draft
>>  recommendation very soon, time to get ahead of the game? See
>>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-rdfa-syntax
>Very interesting.  Two questions.
>(1)If RDF/A becomes a recommendation, does it imply appropriate change will
>be made in XHTML/HTML? Because there are many new attributes that would
>invalid a X/HTML document.

I believe the intent is that RDF/A will be consistent with XHTML in 
its current form, but check with the RDF/A authors.

>(2)What is the relationship between RDF/A and GRDDL?
>If this is the question that I should ask at another interet group, please
>point me to there. :-)

Sound like issues you should raise on public-swbp-wg@w3.org.

There may be something in the archives 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/ . There seem to 
be a lot of references in there to GRDDL. I confess to not having 
been following this WG activity in close detail, only the near-final 



IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:43:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:24 UTC